作者：郭虎林1, 张亮2
作者单位：1. 郑州计量先进技术研究院, 河南 郑州 450000;
2. 中国计量科学研究院, 北京 100029
关键词：计算流体力学;相对误差;速度面积法;积分方法;体积流量
摘要：
电厂引风机前后矩形烟道由于场地限制往往不能满足国标要求的直管段长度，导致体积流量测量误差偏大，选取合理的测量方法是提高体积流量测量精度的重要途径。利用计算流体力学(CFD)方法对矩形烟道内部流场进行数值模拟，对比分析在烟道弯管上游0.5~2.3倍当量直径的4个测量截面上应用4种不同积分方法进行体积流量测量的相对误差。发现等面积法仅适合在流场发展充分的区域进行体积流量测量但测量效果较差，而在烟道长度受限流场发展不充分的区域，对数切比雪夫法、对数线性法和高斯-勒让德积分法具有更高的测量精度。当测量位置相同测点数量接近时，对数线性法测量相对误差低至0.3255%，远小于其他积分方法的测量结果。
Comparison of different integral methods in area velocity method for rectangular stack based on CFD
GUO Hulin1, ZHANG Liang2
1. Zhengzhou Institute of Metrology, Zhengzhou 450000, China;
2. National Institute of Metrology, China, Beijing 100029, China
Abstract: Due to the space limitation, the rectangular stack before and after the induced draft fan in power plant often can’t meet the straight pipe length required by the national standard, which leads to the large error of volume flow measurement. Selecting a reasonable measurement method is an important way to improve the accuracy of volume flow computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method was used to simulate the flow field in a rectangular stack. The relative errors of four different integral methods for volume flow measurement on four cross-sections with 0.5 - 2.3 times of the equivalent diameter upstream of the stack bend are compared and analyzed. It is found that EPA method is only suitable for volume flow measurement in the area where the flow field is fully developed, but the effect is poor. In the region where the flow field is not fully developed, Log-Chebyshev method, Log-Linear method and Gauss-Legendre integral method have higher measurement accuracy. When the cross-section is the same and the number of traverse points is close, the relative error of Log-Linear method can be as low as 0.3255%, which is far less than that of other integral methods.
Keywords: CFD;relative error;area velocity method;integral method;volume flow
2023, 49(6):22-29 收稿日期: 2021-09-07;收到修改稿日期: 2021-12-24
基金项目:
作者简介: 郭虎林(1992-),男,河南汝州市人,硕士,主要从事流量计量研究
参考文献
[1] 樊洁云, 张亮, 方立德, 等. 烟气超声流量计时间测量准确度校准方法研究[J]. 中国测试, 2020, 46(2): 28-33
[2] 桑晓鸣, 万丽芬, 耿睿, 等. 临界流音速喷嘴标准装置检测皮托管实验研究[J]. 中国计量, 2013(5): 87-89
[3] Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units[EB/OL]. (2014-08-01). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/01/08/2013-28668/standards-of-performance-for-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-new-stationary-sources-electric-utility.
[4] 固定污染源排气中颗粒物测定与气态污染物采样方法: GB/T 16157—1996[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1996.
[5] 固定污染源烟气(SO2、NOX、颗粒物)排放连续监测技术规范: HJ 75—2017[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2017.
[6] 固定源废气监测技术规范: HJ/T 397—2007[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2007.
[7] 黄钟霆, 龚道新, 吴小平, 等. 火电厂烟气在线监测系统存在的主要问题及进一步加强在线监测工作的建议[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2010, 20(1): 62-66
[8] BRYANT R, SANNI O, MOORE E, et al. An uncertainty analysis of mean flow velocity measurements used to quantify emissions from stationary sources[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2014, 64(6): 679-689
[9] 周宁宁, 梁国伟. 速度面积法中不同特征点位置选择法之比较[J]. 中国计量学院学报, 2003, 14(2): 104-108
[10] ARÉ I, BONTHOUX F, FONTAINE J R. Measurement of air flow in duct by velocity measurements[J]. EPJ Web of Conferences, 2014, 77: 00010
[11] 梁国伟. 速度面积法中对数线性选点的合理性及适用性[J]. 中国计量学院学报, 1992(2): 64-69
[12] Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits — Velocity area method using Pitot static tubes: ISO 3966: 2008[S]. The International Organization for Standardization, 2008.
[13] 崔廷, 苗芊, 苏东赢, 等. 烟用层流流量传感器测量准确性研究[J]. 中国测试, 2019, 45(11): 90-94
